Page 14 - Chicagp Fall EXPO 2019
P. 14

14 THE CHICAGOLAND COOPERATOR   —FALL 2019  CHICAGOCOOPERATOR.COM  BOARD OPERATIONS  Board Optics  The Perception of Performance   BY MIKE ODENTHAL  Community association and co-op  positive results from the board’s endeavor.  boards typically consist of elected volunteers   whose job is to serve the best interests of the   community in day-to-day decisions both big  Thomas O. Moriarty, a principal at the law  ers, owners  nearly  always  perceive  that  as   and small. In an ideal world, every board  firm  of  Moriarty  Troyer  &  Malloy,  which  negative. “While there are always exceptions   would live and die by its fiduciary duty, mak-  ing well-informed choices that not only keep  chusetts. “While perception of performance  attorney-client privilege, for example -- or   its community or building solvent, but also  alone is obviously not enough to deliver  because statutes may prevent the disclosure   maintain a pleasant environment in which  results, results alone are not enough to en-  to live. But would even that ideal scenario  sure contentment among unit owners. The  other circumstance it is almost always bet-  be enough? If a board is doing all the right  fact of the matter is that unless a board has  ter to communicate as much information as   things  but fails to communicate the hows  systems in place to ensure that unit own-  and whys of its decisions to its constituents,  ers believe they have a voice in the process  the owners want to hear. Reasonable unit   will those decisions be received approvingly?  of governance, those owners may never be  owners will understand that not all news is   Truth is, in addition to making good  happy with the results. In addition, if the ac-  decisions, it also falls to the board to com-  municate those decisions – as well as how  transparent, unit owners may not even be  they have more accurate and reliable infor-  they were reached - to its community in a  aware of the issues the board is confronting  mation, good or bad.”  clear and digestible way. The reasoning for  —never mind whether the board has done a   this goes beyond just getting reelected; to a  competent job pursuing resolutions.   diligent and capable board, optics may seem   performative—but they’re actually a crucial  and expect that when they buy a unit, they  methodology. “It’s essential to pay attention   part of being open and transparent with the  become members of a self-governing asso-  residents that board represents. A certain  ciation,” Moriarty continues. “While they  the future,” warns Mark N. Axinn, a partner   amount of marketing and salesmanship is of-  ten needed to get buy-in from the folks most  they nevertheless have an important eco-  directly impacted by a given board decision.  nomic and personal interest in how the  reviewed by a future board, it should be clear   A board that does the right thing without  board conducts its business. A unit owner  what the people at the time were consider-  showing its work can still face backlash from  who cannot obtain enough information to  ing, and why a particular decision was made.   residents who interpret the board’s discre-  tion as secrecy, or who don’t see immediate  board’s decision-making is not going to de-  The Messaging Matters  “Optics are extremely important,” says  fail to communicate their process to own-  has offices in Boston and Braintree, Massa-  tions and deliberations of the board are not  with board operations and governance if   “Knowledgeable unit owners understand  by  being  explicit  with  its  decision-making   might not volunteer to serve on the board,  with the New York City-based law firm of   reasonably assess the merits of his or her  Records should be kept in such a manner   velop  confidence  and  trust in that  board.   This can lead to frustration and skepticism.”  Moriarty goes on to say that when boards   based upon the need for confidentiality --   of  certain information,”  he  says,  “in  every   possible, even if the information is not what   good news, and they will be more content   A current board can make association   business easier for its eventual replacement   to the details, or there can be problems in   Brill & Meisel. “For example, when files are   that someone who is not familiar with an is-  sue can easily ascertain what happened and   why certain decisions were made.”   According  to  Jacqueline  Abraham,  Re-  gional Director for Lieberman Management   Services, which has offices in Chicago and   Elk Grove Village, Illinois,  a resident will   occasionally run for the board with the in-  tended goal of improving its optics. “Once   elected, these board members realize that   there is a need for greater transparency, and   make efforts to steer the other members to   communicate more with the community,”   Abraham says. “This could mean forming a   committee to create and send a monthly or   quarterly newsletter, sending meeting min-  utes to owners electronically immediately   following a board meeting, installing a bul-  letin board in the common area on which   they’ll post community updates and notices,   or  utilizing  a community  website to  store   documents and share information.”  Backlash  For a board, neglecting optics and ignor-  ing the public relations aspect of its job can   have abject consequences.  “Boards often forget the messaging aspect   inherent  in  getting  information  to  owners   before a new policy takes effect,” notes Ax-  inn. “This is especially true if there is a new   restriction or a new charge being considered.   For example, if a board decides to imple-  ment a fee for subletting, it is important to   convey to the owners that \\\[the purpose\\\] of   the fee is to raise funds to help limit future   maintenance increases.”  Different states have different laws con-  cerning how information can be distributed   to condo or co-op residents; some allow for   electronic communications, and some re-  quire actual hard copies to be sent via reg-  istered mail or hand delivered. Regardless   of the rules where you live, it’s important to   note that impersonal methods of outreach   – like email – should not be a substitute for   actually interacting with constituents in per-  son.   “Email should not be used to eliminate or   avoid discussion at board meetings,” warns   Allison L. Hertz, a senior associate with Kaye   Bender Rembaum, a law firm with locations   in Pompano Beach, Palm Beach Gardens,   and Tampa, Florida. “In most circumstances,   board meetings are required to be open to   members \\\[so\\\] the members of the associa-  tion are able to hear how the board makes   continued on page 36 


































































































   12   13   14   15   16