Page 30 - Chicagp Fall EXPO 2019
P. 30

30 THE CHICAGOLAND COOPERATOR   —FALL 2019  CHICAGOCOOPERATOR.COM  LAW & LEGISLATION  Interesting    Conflicts  How Various State Laws Combat Conflicts of   Interest in Association Boards  BY MIKE ODENTHAL  There is a natural inclination in business  their associations going forth. For a primer, a   to work with those whom you know and  portion of that memo is excerpted below:  trust. Relying on relationships that have de-  veloped over time is just a commonsense way   to ensure that you’re getting a fair deal from   a competent vendor who will perform their   job with inducing minimal headaches. All of   this is well and good. But when an individual   board member stands to profit from hiring a   preferred vendor in any way  – and fails to dis-  close the true nature of the transaction  – then   you’re talking about a potential conflict of in-  terest, which is decidedly less kosher.  Individual states have assorted rules and   regulations – usually within their respective   condo acts – designed to prevent self-dealing   and ensure that association business stays on   the up-and-up for the benefit of every owner   or shareholder, rather than specific individu-  als. In New York, for example, there is the   Business Corporation Law, under which most   cooperatives in the state were created. It’s   worth taking another look at the law, similar   legislation in other states, and conflict of in-  terest in general.   In response to the BCL changes, Richard   Klein and Emil Samman, partners at New   York City law firm Romer Debbas LLP, sent   out a packet to their board members advising   them as to how the law will continue to affect   For years, section 713(a) of the BCL has   provided that if a director of a board has a   substantial financial interest in a contract or   transaction between a contractor or vendor   and the board, this interest must be disclosed   to the board. In such a situation, that director   cannot vote on that contract or transaction and   must recuse him/herself from any deliberations   on the matter.  Further, Section 713(b) provides that if the   contract or transaction was entered into with-  out such a disclosure from the interested board   member, the board may void the contract or   transaction unless it can be established that the   contract was fair and reasonable at the time it   was authorized by the board.  Now, effective as of January 1, 2018, the new   addition to the BCL has imposed two new re-  quirements on cooperative and condominium   boards of directors/managers when dealing   with contracts or transactions that would fall   into the category mentioned above.   First, Section 727 establishes a requirement   that cooperatives and condominiums must give   each board member a copy of BCL Section 713   at least once a year. What is interesting is that   as the law is currently written, it would seem   to apply to condominiums despite the fact that 


































































































   28   29   30   31   32