Page 14 - Chicago Cooperator Spring 2020
P. 14

14 THE CHICAGOLAND COOPERATOR   —SPRING 2020  CHICAGOCOOPERATOR.COM  Of his time in the industry, Wolf says,   “Other apps for direct management are great   and have really improved our ability to com-  plete our tasks more efficiently and quickly.”    He includes such innovations as apps that   notify owners of rules or building violations,   platforms that allow for online bill approval   and payment, and remote access to desktop   computers,  which provides  managers with   much more flexibility. The one tradeoff he   sees is that these new capabilities have a   tendency to replace direct conversation and  ment is a challenging and demanding job,   visual inspection—still necessities in many  do managers stick with it? Do they adapt to   circumstances.   While age is not the determinant fac-  tor when assigning a manager to a specific  in five years or longer, chances are, you’ll   property, management firms will still con-  sider the level of maturity and experience   required for the particular building or  that’s something that’s been consistent over   community. The right ‘fit’ between a man-  ager and a property might include the age  managers are basically on call 24/7—and   of the manager relative to the client com-  munity population, but other variables that  loads. Wolf points out, “While the number   are harder to quantify usually play more of a  of unit owners that tend to take advantage of   role in the assignment.  Educational Requirements  Wollman notes that most people come to   the real estate business—particularly prop-  erty management—by a less than direct   route. Up until a few years ago, there were   very few college- or university-based aca-  demic programs leading to a career in real   estate.  Even  though  the  academic  options   are widening, it seems that success in the in-  dustry has more to do with experience and   personality than it does with degrees.  “No one expects post-graduate educa-  tion in our business,” Wollman says. “People   who come into management often have past   work experience or education in architec-  ture, finance, et cetera, and they can modify   their experience to become good managers.   Most importantly, they need to be good peo-  ple persons, and that hasn’t changed. Truth-  fully, though, 20 years ago people did get in   with less experience and a more limited skill   set. I learned by doing, and we still do. I be-  lieve this may be the last industry like this.”  Wolf points out that although Massachu-  setts is a non-license state—in that property   managers are not legally required to hold   any particular certification or accreditation   to work in the field—his company requires   managers to pursue continuing education   throughout their tenure with the firm. “We   send our people for courses through CAI   \[the Community Associations Institute\],” he   says. “We expect them to get involved with   a committee at CAI—any committee they   like that interests them.” Wolf believes that   such a continuing education policy is typical   throughout the industry in New England.  Career Longevity  Seeing as multifamily property manage-  changing variables to advance their careers?    Both Wollman and Wolf say yes. “If you stay   stay in permanently,” says Wolf.   Many factors affect that decision, and   time. Management involves long hours—  little appreciation, along with heavy work-  a manager is a very small percentage overall,   \[those residents\] can be very disturbing for   the manager.  The ‘thank yous’ the manager   gets from the other 97 or so percent make all   the difference.”   This might serve as a good reminder to   show some appreciation for your manager if   you want him or her to stick around. “Some   managers who leave the business go on to do   project work,” says Wollman, “but the truth   is there aren’t a lot of alternatives. And we   do everything we can to keep good people.”   In the final analysis, the changes in real   estate management over the last 20 years   have had more to do with the way technol-  ogy has altered the way we all live and work,   and less to do with the soft skills that the   profession requires: communication, con-  sistency, and connection.  Despite email,   text, apps, and other innovations, it’s still a   people business—and it’s likely to stay that   way.                                                                     n  A J Sidransky is a staff writer/reporter with   The Chicagoland Cooperator, and a published   novelist.   EVERYTHING FROM    A (ACCOUNTING SERVICES)    TO W (WINDOWS).   (Sorry, no zebra trainer this year.)  STEPHENS CONVENTION CENTER, ROSEMONT — WEDNESDAY, MAY 13, 10-3:30    FREE REGISTRATION: CHICAGOCONDOEXPO.COM  THE COOPERATOR  EXPO  2020  WHERE BUILDINGS MEET SERVICES  THE EVOLUTION...  continued from page 13  tary value to a property, and most impor-  tantly, they can smell great and contribute   oxygen and fresh air.”  “Neighbors congregate over landscap-  ing, over flowers, and over seasonal dis-  plays,” adds  Avery.  “Communities  com-  pete to be the best-looking property, and   it feels good to live in a community that   makes an effort to promote its curb ap-  peal. During events such as weddings,   graduations, and parties, you often see   folks gather in front of planters or flow-  ers to pose for photographs, which to me   means that they want to capture the beau-  ty of the garden at that moment.”  Whenever  homeowners  get  to  own—  or at least steer—a project, they tend to   feel more in touch with, and even integral   to,  the  greater  community,  notes  Fries.   “Working on a garden should enable a   committee  to oversee other important   communal issues, including:  • monitoring the work of the landscape   contractor to ensure that the duties un-  der contract for landscaping of common   areas  and  private  homes  are  performed   as scheduled and in a manner consistent   with the quality for which the association   has contracted;  •becoming familiar with the operation   of the irrigation system, drainage basins,   and aerators;   • determining need for additional ser-  vices as resident population increases or   other needs arise, and making recom-  mendations to the board; and  • advising the Architectural Review   Board on landscape issues related to ARB   applications, if requested by the ARB.”  A Warning  Of course, when it comes to planting   gardens—or any common area improve-  ment project, really—an association   should be mindful to never bite off more   than it can chew.  “As the manager, we see to it that noth-  ing falls to ill-repair,” says Avery, “but I   can understand how a property might al-  low its gardening to become overgrown.   These are often budget-challenged com-  munities with few funds to spare for   beautification. Negligence here would be   a mistake, however, as buyers are attract-  ed by curb appeal, and might never even   enter a property to see the units if the ex-  terior is unsightly. If there are few funds   available to accommodate gardening, the   community should consider containers in   strategic places, or simply plant ground-  cover.”     n  Mike Odenthal is a staff writer/reporter   with The Chicagoland Cooperator.   CULTIVATING...  continued from page 6  A  James R. Stevens, principal at   Chicago-based law firm Chu-  hak & Tecson, says, “Gener-  ally, a cooperative (at least in Illinois) is re-  sponsible, through its board of shareholder   directors, for the maintenance and repair   of the common portions of the property, of   which the roof would be included. Roof leaks   in shared living are often a difficult problem   as it may take many attempts to determine,   isolate, and fix the problem, all while leaks   continue in the interim. Despite this inconve-  nience, boards, generally, should rely on the   advice of qualified professionals in undertak-  ing various repairs to the common portions   of the property, including the roof.  “The reader indicates that the co-op board   has been working on the roof issue for eight   months. We see these situations frequently,   where a board may attempt less expensive or   less major repairs to tackle a persistent leak   with an otherwise operational roof, and some   opt,  based  on  a  contractor’s  recommenda-  tion, to address a problem in stages. Often,   qualified contractors may recommend trying   a variety of minor repairs instead of rushing   to a full re-roof which can be very costly.  “Owners often wonder if they have legal   rights to sue to force work or alter a course   of repair. That, unfortunately, depends greatly   on the history of the problem, the specific is-  sues at hand, and the governing documents   of the co-op. Co-op owners may have a legal   right in the governing documents or in court   Q&A  continued from page 5


































































































   12   13   14   15   16