Q&A: Patio Uh-Oh

Wehn building a patio prepare to use level and barrel constantly, patio island have polymeric sand layed and job completion almost done when final pavers cut and placed

Q. Five years ago, an owner who was on the board for a year and was newly in charge of maintenance had his own new patio removed and hired our usual contractor to pour a new, larger patio—which of course meant using common element property. Our lawyer had advised him and the board the year before that this could be done only with permission of the board and an official 99-year lease that needed to be drawn up by a lawyer and filed with the county. The owner has never done either one. The board has been unwilling to enforce this caveat. Can it still be done, and if so, how?

                                      —A Brick Too Far

A. “Generally,” says attorney James Stevens, principal with law firm Chuhak & Tecson in Chicago, “encroachments into the common elements of a condominium depend wholly on the terms of the declaration for that community. Without reading those here specifically, there is no way to say whether such a patio construction would require any amendments to the covenants or a ‘ground lease’ of sorts as mentioned here. Owners often have patios assigned for the benefit of their particular unit, usually called ‘limited common elements,’ which can be a portion of the common elements reserved for the benefit of one unit exclusively to others. Normally, reconstruction or rebuilding of existing common elements does not require any kind of alteration to the declaration, but extension or increasing the size of those items may. The board here should discuss the issue with their community association lawyer to determine what is necessary per the governing documents. 

“When additions are allowed, board and owners often document those additions using an amendment to the declaration or some other kind of recorded document that memorializes the agreement to extend and makes it clear for both owners and boards that come in the future that such addition was allowed. It is a good practice, too, to make sure that owners remain responsible for the maintenance and repair of such additions and to include those terms in the recorded document.”

Related Articles

Q&A: Dishwasher Dilemma

Q&A: Dishwasher Dilemma

Q&A: Dishwasher Dilemma

Group of people and empty boss office chair, flat vector isometric illustration. Human resources management, hiring, recruiting.

The Headless HOA (or Co-op or Condo)

Can a Common-Interest Community Exist without a Board?

Business people studying list of rules, reading guidance, making checklist. Vector illustration for company order, restrictions, law, regulations concept

Amending Documents

Bylaws, House Rules & More

Confused business team finding answer or solution to solve problem, work question or doubt and suspicion in work process concept, businessman and woman team thinking with question mark symbol.

Q&A: Breaking Bad Board

Q&A: Breaking Bad Board

Industry 4.0 Modern Factory: Security Operator Controls Proper Functioning of Workshop Production Line, Uses Computer with Screens Showing Surveillance Camera Feed. High-Tech Security

Surveillance in Buildings & HOAs

Privacy vs. Safety

Partners hands together teamwork group of business people meeting in firm company office. Diversity Hands join empower partnership teams connection community. Success Mergers acquisitions partnership

Fiduciary Duty Explained

One for All - Not All for One